 |
Current state-of-the-art optical
sensors utilize fiber optic circuits in combination
with fluorescent indicator molecules (see Figure 2).
Excitation light passes from the source through one
leg of a bifurcated fiber bundle to the sensing element
(a permeable polymeric matrix that contains the fluorescent
indicator molecules). A portion of the fluorescent light
emitted by the indicator is captured within the second
leg of the fiber bundle and delivered to a detector.
A key problem with such systems is poor optical efficiency
(i.e., how much of the energy provided by the initial
excitation light source is ultimately delivered to the
detector): the highest optical energy efficiency reported
in the scientific literature is 0.03%. As a result,
the signal-to-noise ratio is very low and sensitivity
is impaired. In order to compensate for this intrinsically
inefficient design and obtain higher signal strength,
very high quality components must be used. In addition
to the high cost of such components, high intensity
light sources destroy the indicator molecules, resulting
in a need for frequent recalibration and/or replacement
of the sensing element.
Figure 2
Another weakness in the existing
fiber optic design is the inherent tradeoff between
response time and sensitivity. Increasing the thickness
of the sensing element (dimension "b" in Figure 2) increases
the sensitivity, by raising the number of indicator
molecules available to interact with the analyte. Increasing
this dimension, however, has the undesirable effect
of increasing sensor response time, because it takes
longer for the analyte molecule to diffuse through a
thicker sensing element.
Copyright © 2010 Sensors for Medicine and Science, Inc.®
All rights reserved. Date of last update: 02/03/10.
Refer to Terms and Conditions
for use of this Web site.
|
 |
